FILED: May 27, 2009

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF OREGON

STATE OF OREGON,

Plaintiff-Respondent,

v.

RAYMOND LEONARD PAWLOWSKI,

Defendant-Appellant.

Marion County Circuit Court
05C44149
A129038

Albin W. Norblad, Judge.

On respondent's petition for reconsideration filed March 19, 2009.� Opinion filed July 23, 2008.� 221 Or App 227, 190 P3d 387.

John R. Kroger, Attorney General, Erika L. Hadlock, Acting Solicitor General, and Paul L. Smith, Assistant Attorney-in-Charge, Criminal Appeals, for petition.

Before Landau, Presiding Judge, and Schuman, Judge, and Ortega, Judge.

PER CURIAM

Reconsideration allowed; former opinion modified and adhered to as modified; former disposition withdrawn; affirmed.

PER CURIAM

The state petitions for reconsideration of our decision in this case.� In that decision, we concluded that, based on the Oregon Supreme Court's decision in State v. Ice, 343 Or 248, 170 P3d 1049 (2007), rev'd and rem'd, ___ US ___, 129 S Ct 711, 172 L Ed 2d 517 (2009), the trial court's imposition of consecutive sentences based on its own findings of fact was plain error.� The state now argues that, in light of the United States Supreme Court's reversal of the Oregon court's decision, we should reconsider.� We agree.� Under the United States Supreme Court's decision, the imposition of consecutive sentences was not error.

Reconsideration allowed; former opinion modified and adhered to as modified; former disposition withdrawn; affirmed.


Top of page Go home