FILED: May 30, 2007

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF OREGON

In the Matter of the Marriage of

SUZANNE GANO-RIDGE,

Petitioner-Appellant,

and

JAMES IVAN RIDGE,

Respondent-Respondent.

Lane County Circuit Court
150316348; A127997

Bryan T. Hodges, Judge.

On appellant's petition for reconsideration filed April 4, 2007, and response to appellant's petition for reconsideration filed April 11, 2007. Opinion filed March 21, 2007. 211 Or App 393, 155 P3d 84.

Jeffrey E. Potter and Gardner, Honsowetz, Potter, Budge & Ford for petition.

Vanessa L. Carter for response.

Before Edmonds, Presiding Judge, and Brewer, Chief Judge, and Wollheim, Judge.

PER CURIAM

Reconsideration allowed; former opinion modified to correct mathematical error; adhered to as modified.

PER CURIAM

Wife, who prevailed as appellant, see Gano-Ridge and Ridge, 211 Or App 393, 155 P3d 84 (2007), petitions for reconsideration, pointing out a mathematical error in our opinion. Wife notes that, at 211 Or App at 411 n 9, we stated the total assets awarded to wife as $334,495, which included the trial court's previous equalizing judgment of $90,495. We then included the amount of the former equalizing judgment again in the equalizing judgment of $311,520, thereby overstating by $90,495 the net property award to wife ($646,015), 211 Or App at 411, when the correct calculation of the property awarded to wife is $555,520. Wife asks the court to increase the equalizing judgment to $402,015 so that the net award to wife is $646,015. As we explained in our opinion, a just and proper award to wife requires an equalizing judgment to wife of $311,520. We accordingly correct the calculation at 211 Or App at 411 n 9 as follows:

$244,000 total assets awarded to wife
$311,520 equalizing judgment
$555,520

We similarly correct the amount stated as the net property award to wife at 211 Or App at 411 as $555,520.

Reconsideration allowed; former opinion modified to correct mathematical error; adhered to as modified.


Top of page Go home