FILED: May 23, 2001

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF OREGON

ROLAND J. MONTOYA,

Appellant,

v.

DAN JOHNSON,
Superintendent,
Snake River Correctional Institution,

Respondent.

97-06-28971M; A100422

On remand from the Oregon Supreme Court. Montoya v. Johnson, 330 Or 360, 6 P3d 1101 (2000).

Appeal from Circuit Court, Malheur County.

J. Burdette Pratt, Judge.

Submitted on remand July 13, 2000.

Bob Pangburn for appellant.

Hardy Myers, Attorney General, Michael D. Reynolds, Solicitor General, and Judy C. Lucas, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

Before Haselton, Presiding Judge, and Edmonds and Landau, Judges.

PER CURIAM

Affirmed.

PER CURIAM

Plaintiff appeals from the trial court's dismissal of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. The crimes for which he is incarcerated took place during the time period during which the administrative rule discussed in Peek v. Thompson, 160 Or App 260, 980 P2d 178, rev dismissed 329 Or 553 (1999), was in effect. However, plaintiff made no argument in the trial court about the potential applicability of that administrative rule and attempts to raise that issue for the first time in a supplemental memorandum to this court. Because the issue was not preserved in the trial court, we do not consider it in the first instance on appeal. ORAP 5.45(4)(a).

Affirmed.


Top of page Go home